Climate Action, Local and Global
Contact your local MPs
Good news stories
Blog (our event stories)
Sustainable House Day - Geelong
LETS - Local Energy Trading System
Transition Towns (local)
Energy / Solar
Energy options for Geelong
Food Swaps in Geelong
Local food production
Waste / Recycling
Living Greener Information
Dumb eco questions you were afraid to ask
Links and resources
YES ! MAGAZINE - [A GREAT READ!]
Renew - Alternative Technology Association News.
THE VICTORIAN CLIMATE ACTION CALENDAR 30 - From Week to Week.
Surf-Coast-Energy-Group [SCEG] News
.350.org - Connecting the Dots
Friends of the Earth (FOE)
Environmentment Victorial - SAFE CLIMATE Bulletin
Environment Victoria. - Water & Healthy Rivers Bulletin.
Australian Conservation Federation NEWS
Australian Conservation Foundation's GREENHOME NEWS.
World Wildlife Fund - News on EARTH HOUR, etc.
100% Renewable Energy Campaigns - important 6 weeks!
"Be the Change" Newsletter
"Victorian Environment Friends Network".
Australian Conservation VOLUNTEERS News.
CERES NEWS - Brunswick
The Climate Reality Project News
The Wilderness Society
Otway Agroforestry Network Newsletter - 2010, April
GENE ETHICS Food News
ABC's Rural Round-Up
Oxfam Newsletters & Announcements.
Fairtrade Labelling News & Fair Trade Association News.
World Society for the Protection of Animals.
Natural Health Alliance from Europe
Victoria Naturally Alliance e-bulletin
World Wildlife Fund -
Building a future in which people and nature thrive.
What you can do
News & resources
opt or Donat
[E.H.: March 29, 2014]
03 June 2013
WWF says bigger cut to emissions possible at almost no extra cost to economy
WWF-Australia today released an economic study to show that under the carbon price Australia’s emission reduction target could jump from 5% to 25% by 2020 at very little additional cost to the economy.
The analysis, by London-based consultancy Vivid Economics and Monash University, found almost no additional impact on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (0.01%) and around 0.06% impact on Gross National Income. According to the report, Australia’s economy would make up for the delayed growth in GDP associated with the extra emissions cuts in less than two months.
“The economic costs of a 25% target are four times lower now than estimated back in 2009 when the Government and Opposition first reached bipartisan agreement on an unconditional cut to emissions of 5%,” WWF spokesperson Will McGoldrick said.
“Much of the 25% reduction would be achieved by buying cheaper-than-expected overseas abatement permits.
“This is the upside to the low carbon price – we can achieve much more for the same impact on GDP.
“If we can achieve a target that is five times stronger for virtually the same cost to GDP then it’s a no-brainer – we’d be mad not to take that opportunity. It’s smart for the planet, it’s smart for our future, and it’s smart for Australia’s world standing.
“No matter who wins the next election, there will be growing international and domestic pressure on Australia to lift its 2020 carbon pollution target above the unconditional 5% target.
“Other nations are ramping up their efforts; we must contribute our fair share to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.
“However, while the study did not examine the Coalition’s “Direct Action” policy it can be inferred that it could not achieve the 25% target at the same low cost because the Coalition explicitly rules out the use of international permits.
“The modelling shows that blocking overseas permits drives up the overall GDP cost. The implication, therefore, is that direct action would come at a higher price to the economy than a carbon price.
“While we applaud the Coalition’s interest in promoting investment at home, this should not come at the expense of being able to move to stronger pollution cuts, and we urge the Coalition to reconsider the benefits of a carbon price.
“The Vivid analysis shows that under a carbon price, Australia could rely less on overseas emissions permits, improve domestic abatement, and still achieve a 25% pollution cut with only a moderate additional impact on economic growth, shaving an extra 0.28% off GDP in 2020 compared to current 5% target.
“The modelling shows that with a carbon price Australia can afford to get the balance right between encouraging domestic abatement and committing to an ambitious and globally credible target,” Mr McGoldrick said.
Copies of report available on request
Mark Symons 0400 985 571
© Geelong Sustainability Group Inc